Google’s Stance On Recovery After Google’s Helpful Content Update
Danny Sullivan, Google’s Search Liaison, recently revisited the discussion regarding recovery timing following the impactful Helpful Content Update.
His message echoed Google’s initial stance – the classifier is continuously assessing content for helpfulness.
But it is proving that long-term commitment takes time.
Concerns surfaced when discussions on various platforms highlighted the absence of recoveries post the September 2023 update.
Morgan Overholt’s claim on X, citing a potential two-week recovery period, was refuted by Sullivan himself.
He Clarified That He Never Mentioned Such Specific Timeframes.
“I don’t recall giving a specific timeframe like that. It would be unusual for me to do so because it’s not what we say in our documentation. It’s not something I’ve also said in posts when people ask about this. Apologies if I misspoke or perhaps confused this with something else. The docs say:
“A natural question some will have is how long will it take for a site to do better if it removes unhelpful content? Sites identified by this system may find the signal applied to them over a period of months. Our classifier runs continuously, allowing it to monitor newly-launched sites and existing ones. As it determines that the unhelpful content hasn’t returned in the long-term, the classification will no longer apply.”
This signals the need for long-term commitment to content quality.
Referencing Google’s documentation, Sullivan reinforced the notion of a months-long validation period, during which the classifier assesses content consistently.
The automated process, operating globally and across languages, is not subject to manual or spam actions…
…but rather a signal among many for ranking.
Daniel Hart’s inquiry about update cycles prompted Sullivan to affirm that the classifier operates continuously, adapting as it perceives sustained improvements in content quality.
Waiting for the next update isn’t necessary; improvements can be recognized independently over time.
Reflecting on insights from a 2022 interview with Google, Sullivan reiterated the validation period. Also, he emphasized the need to demonstrate an ongoing commitment to content improvement for sustained recovery.
Recovery post-update remains uncertain for many affected sites, with the waiting game for ranking changes ongoing.
A continuous evaluation and adjustment of ranking based on perceived improvements is the key to recovery post-Google’s Helpful Content Update. Patience and long-term dedication are paramount in navigating the recovery process.
